Home » Trial Ethics » Activities & Workshops » Consultation on Standards of Prevention March 09
Consultation on Standards of Prevention March 09
![]() |
Consultation on Standards of Prevention in HIV Prevention Trials
Speke Resort Munyonyo, Kampala, Uganda
March 26-28, 2009
Day 1: Thursday, March 26, 2009
Session I: Setting the Stage
Scientific and Ethical Challenges in HIV Prevention Trials
Lori Heise, Global Campaign for Microbicides
Genesis and Evolution of the UNAIDS/WHO Ethics Guidance on Biomedical Prevention Trials
Ruth Macklin, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Session II: Prevention Trial Realities
Walking in My Shoes
Lynn Paxton, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Session III: Participatory Exercise (No slides available)
Session IV: Ethical Frameworks
Overview of Bioethical Frameworks
Sean Philpott, Global Campaign for Microbicides
Panel Discussion
Ethics, Standards of Prevention, and HIV Prevention Trials, Jeremy Sugarman, Johns Hopkins University
Male circumcision as a (compulsary) component of a HIV prevention package in a HIV vaccine trial, Jerome Singh, CAPRISA, University of KwaZulu Natal
Ethical Assessment of Standard of Prevention, Joseph Mfutso Bengo, University of Malawi
Day 2: Friday, March 27, 2009
Review of Key Issues
Elizabeth McGrory, Consultant
Session V: Where Are We Now?
Current Practice
Samu Dube, Global Campaign for Microbicides
Standards of Prevention and Sample Size
Doug Taylor, Family Health International
Session VI: Considering New Prevention Modalities
Interpreting What Works: An Epidemiologist's and Trialist's Perspective
Janneke van de Wijgert, Center for Poverty-Related Communicable Diseases
Session VII: Thresholds of Evidence for New Methods
What is the Threshold of Evidence for New Prevention Tools?
Normative Agencies, Catherine Hankins, UNAIDS
National Regulatory Agencies, Rajen Misra, Medicines Regulatory Authority, South Africa
Data and Safety Monitoring Boards, Timothy Farley, World Health Organization
Investigators, Guy de Bruyn, Perinatal HIV Research Unit
Community Advisory Boards, Marie-Michelle Umulisa, Project Ubuzima
Advocates, Pauline Irungu, Global Campaign for Microbicides
* Institutional Review Boards/Ethics Committees, Tom Lutalo, Uganda Virus Research Institute
(No slides available)
Session VIII: Providing Access to New HIV Prevention Methods in the Research Setting
Facilitated Exercise (No slides available)
Session IX: Implications for Real Life HIV Prevention Trials
Investigator's Perspective, Helen Rees, Reproductive Health and HIV Research Unit
Community's Perspective, Morenike Ukpong, Nigerian HIV Vaccine and Microbicides Advocacy Society
Day 3: Saturday, March 29, 2009
Session X: Prevention Methods in the Research Setting
Examples from Related Prevention Fields
Liza Dawson, National Institutes of Health
Session XI: Process and Decision Making
How Do We Decide?
Sheena McCormack, Microbicides Development Programme, Medical Research Council
Session XII: Implications of Adding New Prevention Tools for Trial Feasibility
Testing Superiority, Equivalence, and Non-Inferiority
Benoit Masse, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute
Overview of Trial Feasibility
Lynn Paxton, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Session XIII: Recommendations and Next Steps
Additional Meeting Documents
Highlighted Publications
Mapping the Standards of Care at Microbicide Clinical Trial Sites (Full Report)
Global Campaign for Microbicides
Mapping the Standards of Care at Microbicide Clinical Trial Sites (Executive Summary)
Global Campaign for Microbicides
Good participatory practice guidelines for biomedical prevention trials
UNAIDS/Aids Vaccine Advocacy Coalition
Ethical considerations in biomedical HIV prevention trials
UNAIDS/WHO
